AP Gov Judicial System Test

studied byStudied by 1 person
0.0(0)
get a hint
hint

Judicial Review

1 / 64

Tags & Description

Studying Progress

New cards
65
Still learning
0
Almost done
0
Mastered
0
65 Terms
0
New cards

Judicial Review

Allows the court to determine the constitutionality and validity of laws

New cards
1
New cards

Checks and Balances

Used to keep the government from getting too powerful in one branch

New cards
2
New cards

Supreme Court Powers

National & local laws, Congress, White House, government agencies, judicial errors

New cards
3
New cards

Plessy vs. Ferguson

(1896) The Court ruled that segregation was not discriminatory (did not violate black civil rights under the Fourteenth Amendment) and provided that blacks received accommodations equal to those of whites. Separate but equal. This happened after Plessy suffered from Jim Crow laws.

New cards
4
New cards

Can the Supreme Court change past decisions?

Yes

New cards
5
New cards

Writ of Certiorari

Order by the Supreme Court directing a lower court to send up the records of a case for review. Losing party files this with the court to review their case.

New cards
6
New cards

Document of the Writ of Certiorari

List of parties, statement of case facts, legal questions for review, arguments as to why the court should grant the wit

New cards
7
New cards

Appeal

Apply to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower court.

New cards
8
New cards

Stare Decisis

Let the decision stand; decisions are based on precedents from previous cases

New cards
9
New cards

Precedent

An example that may serve as a basis for imitation or later action. Legal principle created by a court decision.

New cards
10
New cards

Judicial Activism

An interpretation of the U.S. constitution holding that the spirit of the times and the needs of the nation can legitimately influence judicial decisions (particularly decisions of the Supreme Court). No precedent to follow.

New cards
11
New cards

Role of the Judicial Branch

To interpret and define law

New cards
12
New cards

Interpretation of Law

Hearing individual cases and deciding how the law should apply

New cards
13
New cards

Federalism

Federal courts for federal law, state courts for state laws

New cards
14
New cards

Where do the courts jurisdiction come from?

Article III of the Constitution

New cards
15
New cards

Article III of the Constitution

Creates the Supreme Court but allows Congress to establish lower courts.

New cards
16
New cards

Supreme Court Numbers

1 court, 9 judges

New cards
17
New cards

Court of Appeals Numbers

12 courts, 3 judges

New cards
18
New cards

District Court Numbers

91 courts, 1 judge

New cards
19
New cards

Hierarchy of the Federal System

District Court --> Court of Appeals --> Supreme Court

New cards
20
New cards

Jurisdiction

The authority of a court to hear a case

New cards
21
New cards

Exclusive Jurisdiction

Authority of only federal courts to hear and decide cases

New cards
22
New cards

Concurrent Jurisdiction

Authority for both state or federal courts to hear and decide cases

New cards
23
New cards

Original Jurisdiction

Court is the first one to hear a case

New cards
24
New cards

Appellate Jurisdiction

Court can only hear a case on appeal

New cards
25
New cards

What type of jurisdiction do U.S. district courts have?

Original

New cards
26
New cards

What type of jurisdiction does the court of appeals have?

Appellate

New cards
27
New cards

What type of jurisdictions does the Supreme Court have?

Original & Appellate

New cards
28
New cards

How are judges appointed?

President nominates someone, then the Senate majority vote confirms it

New cards
29
New cards

Senatorial Courtesy

Presidential custom of submitting the names of prospective appointees for approval to senators from the states in which the appointees are to work.

New cards
30
New cards

How long do judges serve for?

For Life

New cards
31
New cards

Why are life terms preferred for judges?

Founding Fathers wanted an independent judiciary

New cards
32
New cards

District Court

Principal trial court in the system (first trial)

New cards
33
New cards

How many districts are there?

94

New cards
34
New cards

What cases does the district court hear?

Criminal and civil

New cards
35
New cards

Process of a criminal case

U.S. attorney gathers up all the evidence against you

Presents it to a grand jury, 16 to 23 people who decide whether there is enough evidence to indict you

If they vote to indict you, trial begins with a new jury

If you lose your trial, you have the option to appeal to a higher court

The higher court does not have to hear your case, they will only take it if there is a significant problem with the lower court decision

Higher courts have the option to overturn or modify lower court decisions

New cards
36
New cards

Grand Jury

16-23 people who decide whether there is enough evidence to indict someone

New cards
37
New cards

Indict

To charge with a crime; accuse

New cards
38
New cards

Supreme Court

The highest federal court in the United States with judicial review

New cards
39
New cards

Marbury vs. Madison Summary

1803 Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review

New cards
40
New cards

Marbury vs. Madison: Adams' Actions

Adams lost to Jefferson in the 1800 election

Adams made Congressional Federalists create new judgeships to save his legacy

Adams selected new Federalists for the new judge positions

New cards
41
New cards

Marbury vs. Madison: Jefferson's Actions

Jefferson was upset and ordered Madison not to deliver the commissions. Then, Marbury (judge) sued Madison

New cards
42
New cards

Judiciary Act of 1789

Gave Supreme Court original jurisdiction in disputes about judgeships.

New cards
43
New cards

Article III & Jurisdiction

Gave Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction in certain cases

New cards
44
New cards

Marbury vs. Madison Decision

The Judiciary Act and Marbury's lawsuit are unconstitutional and they established the official of the judicial review

New cards
45
New cards

How did Marbury vs. Madison make history?

First time the Supreme Court struck down a government act as unconstitutional

New cards
46
New cards

Alternate Route to the Supreme Court

Superior Court --> Arizona Court of Appeals --> Arizona Supreme Court --> Supreme Court

New cards
47
New cards

When does a court issue a writ of certiorari?

If 4/9 judges wish to hear it

New cards
48
New cards

Rule of 4

How the Supreme Court decides whether to hear a case. Requires four or more justices to "grant certiorari" (agree to hear an appeal). Supreme Court agrees to hear <1% of cases.

New cards
49
New cards

Certificate

A method of putting a case before the Supreme Court; used when a lower court is not clear about the procedure or rule of law that should apply in a case and asks the Supreme Court to certify the answer to a specific question

New cards
50
New cards

How are trials different?

Do not function like principal trial courts because there is no evidence presented or witnesses questioned

New cards
51
New cards

How are trials processed at the Supreme Court?

1 attorney for each side presents their arguments for 30 mins while being questioned by judges

New cards
52
New cards

What happens after arguments are over in a trial process?

Justices write opinions on the case and each justice chooses which opinion to sign their name to

New cards
53
New cards

Opinions

A statement by the court expressing the reasons for its decision in a case.

New cards
54
New cards

Majority Opinion

Final decision on the case, signed by at least 5 justices

New cards
55
New cards

Aftermath of a Majority Opinion

Becomes precedent for how future similar cases should be decided

New cards
56
New cards

Dissenting Opinion

A statement written by a justice who disagrees with the majority opinion, presenting his or her opinion

New cards
57
New cards

Importance of Dissenting Opinions

They can be used as a legal basis to overthrow existing precedent in later cases

New cards
58
New cards

Concurring Opinion

An opinion that agrees with the majority in a Supreme Court ruling but differs on the reasoning.

New cards
59
New cards

Recuse

Challenge (a judge, prosecutor, or juror) as unqualified to perform legal duties because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality.

New cards
60
New cards

When does recusing happen?

When a justice has a conflict of interest in a case

New cards
61
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Allowed Congress to use implied powers under Necessary and Proper Clause

New cards
62
New cards

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

Allowed Congress to regulate all commercial interactions under Commerce Clause

New cards
63
New cards

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

Ruled slaves were not citizens under the Constitution; struck down Missouri Compromise (Taney Court)

New cards
64
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Overrules Plessy v. Ferguson (no stare decisis). Racial segregation violates 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause ("separate is inherently unequal")

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 77 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 18 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 5 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 33 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 46 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 8 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard30 terms
studied byStudied by 4 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(4)
flashcards Flashcard94 terms
studied byStudied by 160 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard40 terms
studied byStudied by 132 people
Updated ... ago
4.3 Stars(7)